Waterboarding Explained

Torture and human rights abuses are never acceptable, ever, under any circumstances. And I mean any. There are ethical and moral ways of treating prisoners and prisoners of war. Just think of the world's abhorrence over the Abu Ghraib prison photographs of prisoners being humiliated and mistreated. Waterboarding is inhumane and inappropriate under any circumstances. End of story.

Treating people, even prisoners, even alleged terrorists, in a humane fashion, like you would wish to be treated, is never the wrong thing to do. As Gandhi said: "An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind."

EX-AGENT BACKS 'TORTURE' TECHNIQUE

A former CIA agent who was part of an interrogation team were public with his account yesterday saying the waterboarding of a top al Qaeda figure was approved at the top levels of the U.S. government.

John Kiriakou, a leader of the team that captured top terror suspect Abu Zubydah, said waterboarding worked - it forced Zubaydah to talk in less than 35 seconds.

Waterboarding is a harsh interrogation technique that involves strapping down a prisoners; covering his mouth with plastic or cloth and pouring water over his face.

The prisoners quickly begins to inhale water, causing the sensation of drowning.

Critics say the technique is torture.

AP

Chinese Journalists' Lawsuit with Yahoo Settled

Here is an article about Yahoo settling with Chinese journalists, after Yahoo provided Chinese authorities with information about the online activities of the journalists. Obviously greed in setting up business in such a new and expanding market overrode any moral misgivings about snitching on online clients to a repressive Chinese regime.

This is from the Wednesday, November 14, 2007, Business Section of the Toronto Star, page B8:

YAHOO SETTLES LAWSUIT OVER DISSIDENTS' EMAILS

San Francisco - Yahoo Inc. yesterday settled a lawsuit with two Chinese journalists who were jailed after the company provided Chinese authorities with information about their online activities.

Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

The two journalists and a family member sued the Sunnyvale, Calif.-based company earlier this year after Yahoo HK, Yahoo's Hong Kong subsidiary, gave Chinese authorities emails containing pro-democracy literature. The jailed journalists alleged in the lawsuit that jailers have tortured them and that Yahoo was responsible.

The company has denied any responsibility and maintained it was complying with Chinese law when it turned over the emails.

The case has raised questions about whether Internet firms should co-operate with governments that deny freedom of speech and frequently crack down on journalists.

Neither side discussed terms of the settlement other than to agree that Yahoo would pay the lawyers' fees of the two journalists and the family member who sued. The three were represented by The World Organization for Human Rights in Washington, D.C.

Shi Tao, a former writer for the financial publication Contemporary Business News, was jailed under state secrecy laws for allegedly providing state secrets to foreigners.

According to the suit, the other journalist, Wang Ziaoning, was arrested in 2002 after Yahoo HK gave police information linking him to his anonymous emails and other political writings he posted online.

Yahoo lawyer Michael Callahan was summoned before the House foreign affairs committee last week to explain testimony he gave to Congress last year. He said then that Yahoo had no information about the nature of China's investigation when the company handed over details that ended up being used to convinct Shi.

Callaghan subsequently has acknowledged that Yahoo officials had received a subpoena-like document that made reference to suspected "illegal provision of state secrets" - a common charge against political dissidents.

But Callahan continued to insist that Yahoo did not know the real nature of the Chinese investigation.